Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jess Riedel's avatar

But isn’t the key premise here that the only possible observations are “good argument for X” and “bad argument for X”? If you also include “good argument for not-X” and “bad argument for not-X”, we could consistently have negligible change to our beliefs after hearing bad arguments so long as the good arguments balance in expectation.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts